Skip to main content
· 9/8/2003

Baum Hydraulics Corp. v. United States

Citations

  • 280 F. Supp. 2d 910
  • 92 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6019
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15640
  • 2003 WL 22075395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “court’s review of the case law and secondary authorities elicits no significant practical differences between the terms ‘nominee’ and ‘alter ego’ ”
  • being unable to locate clear definition or application of nominee theory in Nebraska, court consults case law from other jurisdictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kopf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.