Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2/4/1994
Bauer v. State
Citations
- 511 N.W.2d 447
- 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 335
- 1994 Minn. LEXIS 55
- 1994 WL 28701
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the urgent public policy considerations in Carradine are not applicable to an administrative personnel matter
- holding government supervisors not entitled to absolute privilege for allegedly defamatory statements made in the context of an administrative personnel matter
- declining to extend absolute privilege to mid-level state employees acting in their official capacities
- declining to extend absolute privilege to mid-level state employees acting in their official capacities
- “The test for actual malice is whether the defamatory statement was made ‘from ill will and improper motives, or causelessly and wantonly for the purpose of injuring the plaintiff.’”
- actual malice defeats qualified privilege and is “generally” fact issue for jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Simonett, Gardebring
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-06-25· cited 107×
- Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit OperationsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-30· cited 65×
- Bol v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-03-13· cited 62×
- Kellar v. VonHoltumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-08-26· cited 49×
- Zutz v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-09-09· cited 26×
- Minnwest Bank Central v. Flagship Properties LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-12-07· cited 24×
- Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-08-10· cited 21×
- Wallin v. Minnesota Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-08-03· cited 14×
- Minke v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-04-09· cited 12×
- BD. OF REGENTS OF U OF M v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-09-30· cited 10×
- Diver v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-11-29· cited 7×
- Carter v. Peace Officers Standards & Training BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-01-14· cited 6×
- Guzhagin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceD. Minnesota· 2008-07-24· cited 6×
- Moore v. HoffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-08-20· cited 5×
- Bolton v. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES, STATECourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-03-29· cited 3×
- Carter v. Peace Officers Standards & Training BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-07-10· cited 2×
- Fieno v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-08-19· cited 1×
- Dorn v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-03-08
- Kempen v. Town of MiddletownSuperior Court of Rhode Island· 2010-01-15
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 279×
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-05-06· cited 212×
- Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-06-21· cited 168×
- Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-31· cited 156×
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-10-19· cited 134×
- Frankson v. Design Space InternationalSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-10-10· cited 69×
- Johnson v. DirkswagerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-01-15· cited 63×
- McKenzie v. William J. Burns International Detective Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1921-06-24· cited 38×
- Carradine v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-02-04· cited 34×
- Freier v. Independent School District No. 197Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-10-23· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.