Skip to main content

Bauer v. State

Citations

  • 511 N.W.2d 447
  • 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 335
  • 1994 Minn. LEXIS 55
  • 1994 WL 28701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the urgent public policy considerations in Carradine are not applicable to an administrative personnel matter
  • holding government supervisors not entitled to absolute privilege for allegedly defamatory statements made in the context of an administrative personnel matter
  • declining to extend absolute privilege to mid-level state employees acting in their official capacities
  • declining to extend absolute privilege to mid-level state employees acting in their official capacities
  • “The test for actual malice is whether the defamatory statement was made ‘from ill will and improper motives, or causelessly and wantonly for the purpose of injuring the plaintiff.’”
  • actual malice defeats qualified privilege and is “generally” fact issue for jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simonett, Gardebring

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.