Bauer v. McKinnon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the word “shall” is normally meant to be mandatory in nature and its interpretation depends upon the context in which it is found
• reasoning that the word “shall” is normally meant to be mandatory in nature and its interpretation depends upon the context in which it is found
• noting that the word \shall\ is \normally meant to be mandatory in nature\
• whether \shall\ is to be considered mandatory or permissive depends on its context and legislative intent
• interpretation of statutory use of \shall\ dependent on context in which found and intent of Legislature as expressed in statute
• interpretation of the word \shall\ as mandatory or discretionary \depends upon the context in which it is found and upon the intent of the legislature as expressed in the statute.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).