Skip to main content
· 3/20/1991

Bauer v. Cole

Citations

  • 467 N.W.2d 221
  • 1991 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 46
  • 1991 WL 36498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating erroneous eviden-tiary ruling “is not reversible error in the absence of prejudice”
  • stating erroneous evidentiary ruling \is not reversible error in the absence of prejudice\
  • stating erroneous evidentiary ruling “is not reversible error in the absence of prejudice”
  • “[A] previous statement of a witness cannot be used for impeachment unless the present testimony is at material variance with the prior statement.”
  • no prejudice in trial court’s ruling prohibiting the admission of exhibit containing alleged inconsistent statements
  • \[A] previous statement of a witness cannot be used for impeachment unless the present testimony is at material variance with the prior statement.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Schultz, Lavorato, Neuman, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.