Bauer v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Teterud was limited to its facts and that the compelling interest test had been rejecting by the Supreme Court when evaluating free exercise challenges to prison regulations
• noting that Tuner balance favors prison officials when regulation does not preclude inmates from practicing at least some of the tenets of their religion
• determining the sincerity of a person's religious belief \is factual in nature and thus is subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review\
• applying the reasonableness test set out in O'Lone to a prison hair length regulation we concluded that \[a]ny other solution would come at more than a de minimis cost to valid penological interests\
• Sioux plaintiff's need to wear long hair was religious and sincerely held
• Native American inmate seeking exemption to grooming regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).