Skip to main content
· 7/8/2008

Bauer v. Astrue

Citations

  • 532 F.3d 606
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14484
  • 2008 WL 2652887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that person whose chronic mental illness is treated with heavy drugs likely will experience better and worse days
  • concluding that an ALJ’s focus on treatment notes with “hopeful remarks” and functional activities of daily living in discounting the opinions of treating sources about the severity of bipolar disorder “suggests a lack of understanding of bipolar disorder”
  • stating that when the treating physician’s opinion is not given controlling weight, “the checklist comes into play”
  • noting that even if a claimant was well enough to work half of the time, she could still not hold down a full-time job
  • noting that “the checklist comes into play” once an opinion is not given controlling weight
  • noting that “the checklist comes into play” once an opinion is not given controlling weight

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Coffey, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.