Bauer, J. v. UCBR

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The language of the warranty must be examined to determine if it explicitly, that is, plainly, warrants future performance.”
• “To be explicit, the warranty must be unambiguous, and will normally ‘indicate that the manufacturer is warranting the future performance of the goods for a specified period of time.’” (quoting R.W. Murray Co. v. Shatterproof Glass Corp., 697 F.2d 818, 823 (8th Cir. 1983))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).