Baude v. Heath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• striking down statute that was discriminatory in effect while citing Pike without addressing the Twenty-first Amendment
• striking down statute that was discriminatory in effect while citing Pike without addressing the Twenty-first Amendment
• “[a]ny balancing approach . . . requires evidence,” and “without understanding the magnitude of both burdens and benefits,” it is impossible to tell whether a particular burden is excessive
• \It is impossible to tell whether a burden on interstate commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits without understanding the magnitude of both burdens and benefits.\
• Pike balancing requires evidence of both benefits No. 11-1362 29 and burdens
• Pike balancing requires evidence of both benefits No. 11-1362 29 and burdens

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).