· 2/15/2006
Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John Boyer
Citations
- 129 P.3d 773
- 204 Or. App. 309
- 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 209
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a trial court may “consider the circumstances underlying the formation of a contract to determine whether a particular contractual provision is ambiguous”
- noting that, at Yogman’s second level, courts can consider extrinsic evidence “to explain an ambiguity, intrinsic or extrinsic. ORS 41.740.”
- stating that the court may con- sider at the first step of contract interpretation extrinsic evi- dence regarding the formation of the contract
- stating that the court may con- sider at the first step extrinsic evidence regarding the formation of the contract
- explaining that the rule from Abercrombie, that circumstances may be considered to determine whether a term is ambiguous, has not been overruled or modified by the legislature
- noting that, to deter- mine whether a provision is ambiguous, the trial court may consider the text in light of the circumstances underlying the formation of the contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.