Skip to main content
· 2/15/2006

Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John Boyer

Citations

  • 129 P.3d 773
  • 204 Or. App. 309
  • 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a trial court may “consider the circumstances underlying the formation of a contract to determine whether a particular contractual provision is ambiguous”
  • noting that, at Yogman’s second level, courts can consider extrinsic evidence “to explain an ambiguity, intrinsic or extrinsic. ORS 41.740.”
  • stating that the court may con- sider at the first step of contract interpretation extrinsic evi- dence regarding the formation of the contract
  • stating that the court may con- sider at the first step extrinsic evidence regarding the formation of the contract
  • explaining that the rule from Abercrombie, that circumstances may be considered to determine whether a term is ambiguous, has not been overruled or modified by the legislature
  • noting that, to deter- mine whether a provision is ambiguous, the trial court may consider the text in light of the circumstances underlying the formation of the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Brewer, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.