Battleson v. Battleson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it was “within the province of the trial court to clarify, interpret or explain what it meant in its prior order,” pursuant to Rule 60.01, when a provision in its parenting plan did not “make sense on its face” and required clarification
• concluding that, pursuant to Rule 60.01, the trial court properly clarified a parenting plan provision that did “not make sense on its face” upon the mother’s motion to clarify the existing provision even though the motion did not specify Rule 60.01 as its basis
• concluding that it was “within the province of the trial - 12 - court to clarify, interpret or explain what it meant in its prior order,” pursuant to Rule 60.01, when a provision in its parenting plan did not “make sense on its face” and required clarification
• “Regarding attorney's fees, the general rule is that a court may award attorney's fees as a sanction for a properly made finding of contempt.”
• stating the trial court could clarify or interpret a provision in the parenting plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).