Battles v. Sliney

Citations

• 126 Pa. 460
• 17 A. 620
• 1889 Pa. LEXIS 898

Syllabus

<p>1. On the trial of an issue in sheriff’s interpleader the plaintiff claimant was allowed to amend the declaration by adding other enumerated articles of household goods to those designated therein; the defendant in the issue having withdrawn all claim of title in the execution defendant to any of the household goods, the allowance of the amendment was not error.</p> <p>2. When an assignment of error, relating to the admission or rejection of testimony, is so drawn that it does not show the testimony adduced, or proposed to be adduced, under the offer admitted or rejected, but merely discloses a question propounded and objected to, and admitted, or refused, it is not in conformity with Rule XXTV. and will be disregarded.*</p>