Battle v. Mineta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that an individual was disabled where alleged disability prevented him from working only with a discrete group of former supervisors
• “[i]nherent in Justice Scalia’s analysis in the Crawford 5 opinion was the idea that the right of confrontation exists as to accusations of third 6 parties implicating a criminal defendant, not a criminal defendant implicating [him] 7 self”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).