First Circuit· 5/20/2011
Battista v. Clarke
Citations
- 645 F.3d 449
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10308
- 2011 WL 1902165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that , the effects of treatment decisions may be relevant to consideration of the subjective component of the Eighth Amendment
- noting that deliberate indifference may be shown by a “wanton disregard [for the prisoner’s medical needs] sufficiently evidenced by denial, delay, or interference with prescribed health care”
- “[S]ecurity considerations also matter at prisons ... and administrators have to balance conflicting demands.”
- “In the end, there is enough in this record to support the district court’s conclusion that ‘deliberate indifference’ has been established — or an unreasonable professional judgment exercised — even though it does not rest on any established sinister motive or ‘purpose to do harm.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Souter, Stahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lewis Rhinehart v. Debra ScuttSixth Circuit· 2018-06-28· cited 689×
- Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2019-08-23· cited 242×
- Kosilek v. SpencerFirst Circuit· 2014-12-16· cited 238×
- Leavitt v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.First Circuit· 2011-06-29· cited 156×
- Perry v. RoyFirst Circuit· 2015-04-03· cited 114×
- Zingg v. GroblewskiFirst Circuit· 2018-10-29· cited 90×
- Snell v. NevilleFirst Circuit· 2021-05-25· cited 46×
- Lopes v. RiendeauD. Massachusetts· 2016-03-30· cited 27×
- Connor B. Ex Rel. Vigurs v. PatrickFirst Circuit· 2014-12-15· cited 21×
- United States v. TumFirst Circuit· 2013-02-01· cited 19×
- Kosilek v. SpencerD. Massachusetts· 2012-09-04· cited 17×
- Soneeya v. SpencerD. Massachusetts· 2012-03-29· cited 16×
- Healey v. DennehyFirst Circuit· 2014-08-27· cited 13×
- Eves v. LePageFirst Circuit· 2016-11-22· cited 12×
- Reaves v. Department of CorrectionD. Massachusetts· 2016-07-15· cited 10×
- Jordan v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2016-01-29· cited 7×
- Abernathy v. DeweyD. Massachusetts· 2017-09-28· cited 7×
- Smego v. PayneSeventh Circuit· 2012-03-21· cited 7×
- Alexander v. WeinerD. Massachusetts· 2012-01-18· cited 7×
- Kosilek v. SpencerFirst Circuit· 2014-01-17· cited 5×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 2,433×
- Sain v. WoodSeventh Circuit· 2008-01-09· cited 489×
- Steven M. Desrosiers v. John J. MoranFirst Circuit· 1991-11-15· cited 394×
- Guillermina Cortes-Quinones v. Charles Jimenez-Nettleship, Etc.First Circuit· 1988-04-22· cited 261×
- Juan Rivera-Muriente v. Juan Agosto-AliceaFirst Circuit· 1992-03-23· cited 250×
- Harris v. Refiners Transport & Terminal Corp.Supreme Court· 1988-10-03· cited 69×
- Patten v. NicholsFourth Circuit· 2001-12-18· cited 65×
- United States v. Quinones-MedinaFirst Circuit· 2009-01-12· cited 39×
- Robert E. Cameron v. Henry TomesFirst Circuit· 1993-03-31· cited 37×
- Iantosca v. Step Plan Services, Inc.First Circuit· 2010-05-03· cited 35×
- Kosilek v. MaloneyD. Massachusetts· 2002-08-28· cited 29×
- Venegas-Hernández v. Asociación De Compositores Y Editores De Música LatinoamericanaFirst Circuit· 2005-09-16· cited 18×
- Robert H. Ketchum v. Dr. Robert W. MarshallTenth Circuit· 1992-05-19· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.