Battin v. Taggert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the Court held that it was error for the trial judge to direct the verdict and remanded for the jury to determine issues of validity and infringement, stating that \[t]he jury are also to judge of the novelty of the invention\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).