Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 3/23/2022
Batterman, C. v. Santo, S.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that prosecutor’s statement regarding motive “reasonably derived from the evidence” at trial
- differing from improper vouching, which constitutes expressing “a personal belief in the credibility of a witness”
- \The so-called Brady obligation is one of disclosure; it imposes no obligation on the prosecution to gather evidence or conduct additional investigation\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.