Skip to main content
· 2/5/1990

Batten v. Howell

Citations

  • 389 S.E.2d 170
  • 300 S.C. 545
  • 1990 S.C. App. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the arbitrators’ factual and legal errors do not constitute an abuse of power under a provision of the South Carolina Arbitration Act that provides for vacation of an arbitration award when arbitrators exceed their powers
  • “The question of whether arbitrators have exceeded their powers relates to arbitrability of the issue they have attempted to resolve.”
  • “The question of whether arbitrators have exceeded their powers relates to arbitrability of the issue they have attempted to resolve.”
  • “[A]n arbitration award is conclusive and courts will refuse to review the merits of an award.... Arbitrators need not specify their reasoning or the basis of the award so long as the factual Inferences and legal conclusions supporting the award are barely colorable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sanders, Gardner, Goolsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.