Batka v. Board of Trustees of Orland Park Police Pension Fund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the Code section is “premised upon a finding that the plaintiff’s disability rendered him unfit for duty”
• no bias where a board member objected to the relevancy of “detailed testimony” at the hearing
• no bias where a board member objected to the relevancy of “detailed testimony” at the hearing
• employee’s disability was related to criticisms by his superior and resentments toward his peers
• where all the doctors who examined Batka agreed he was suffering from stress, much of which centered on a problem with the chief, but disagreed on whether plaintiff could continue to work as a police officer; three of the doctors, however, certified Batka was not fit for duty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).