Batiste v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that identity of appellant as probationer was “fully proved” by appellant’s own responses to the trial court’s questions in addition to thumbprint evidence
• concluding that identity of appellant as probationer was “fully proved” by appellant’s own responses to the trial court’s questions in addition to thumbprint evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lavalle Johnson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2012-11-05· cited 18×
• Hillburn v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1982-01-29· cited 16×
• Riera v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-01-18· cited 16×
• Pettit v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1983-12-08· cited 14×
• Cannon v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-05-19· cited 13×
• DeWayne Antoin Anderson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-08-31
• Noraida Sanchez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2012-11-05
• John Roland Guzman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2010-10-21

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barrow v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-20· cited 28×
• Hogan v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-09-23· cited 28×