Batista Zabala v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that both tests applied in determining 7 whether cement mixer was defective
• “[T]here is no requirement under Arizona law that 7 expert testimony be given in a products liability action.”
• “[I]t is apparent that there is no 24 requirement under Arizona law that expert testimony be given in a products liability 25 action.”
• “[I]t is 17 apparent that there is no requirement under Arizona law that expert testimony be given in 18 a products liability action.”
• “[I]t is a jury determination as to whether the lack of such 4 warnings proximately caused [Plaintiff’s] injuries and death.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).