Skip to main content
· 1/25/2022

Bath Iron Works Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in light of public interest involved, although issue not properly presented for decision, court expressed opinion on fully argued issue
  • “in view of the public interest involved and the uncertainty ... we ought... to express briefly our opinion”
  • issue “not properly presented for discussion” addressed “in view of the public interest involved and the uncertainty and confusion now existing”
  • “in view of the public interest involved and the uncertainty and confusion now existing ... we ought . . . to express . . . our opinion”
  • college did not serve meals to “the public” for purposes of tax statute where dining accommodations were “restricted to a small, well defined number of classes”
  • college was not “in the business of” serving meals to the public for purposes of meal tax, but rather, that was incidental to its function as an educational institution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thrasher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.