Bath & Body Works, Inc., and Bathco, Inc. v. Luzier Personalized Cosmetics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reversal is warranted only \when the abuse of discretion results in more than harmless error\
• holding that reversal is warranted only “when the abuse of discretion results in more than harmless error”
• stating that the “test for genericness is whether the public perceives the term primarily as the designation of the article”
• stating that the district court properly instructed the jury to consider the trade dresses in their entirety according to the applicable law of Opryland USA
• stating that the “test for genericness is whether the public perceives the term primarily as the designation of the article”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).