Bates v. State
Citations
- 19 Ohio C.C. Dec. 189
- 9 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 273
Syllabus
<p>BIGAMY.</p> <p>Norris, Hurin and Donnelly, JJ.</p> <p>Common-law Makriage, So-called, Invalid in Ohio as a Basis fob the Charge . oi' Bigamy.</p> <p>Cohabitation and acknowledgment of the marriage relation by a man and woman, but without statutory marriage, do not, in Ohio, constitute a valid marriage, on which an indictment for bigamy can be founded.</p> <p>[For other cases in point, see 1 Cyc. Dig., “Bigamy,” §§ 1-3. — Ed.]</p> <p>LSyllabus by the court.]</p>
Judges: Hurin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tracy v. FreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1904-07-01· cited 26×
- State v. RoswellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1827-07-15· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. LittlejohnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1818-05-15· cited 18×
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of SchmidtNew York Surrogate's Court· 1904-01-15· cited 8×
- Taylor v. SwettSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1831-09-15· cited 7×
- Houpt v. HouptOhio Supreme Court· 1832-12-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.