Skip to main content

Bates v. State

Citations

  • 258 P.3d 851
  • 2011 Alas. App. LEXIS 48
  • 2011 WL 2177298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that term “sexual relationship” is “sufficiently definite to survive . . . vagueness challenge”
  • concluding that term “sexual relationship” is “sufficiently definite to survive . . . vagueness challenge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.