Court of Appeals of Alaska· 6/3/2011
Bates v. State
Citations
- 258 P.3d 851
- 2011 Alas. App. LEXIS 48
- 2011 WL 2177298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that term “sexual relationship” is “sufficiently definite to survive . . . vagueness challenge”
- concluding that term “sexual relationship” is “sufficiently definite to survive . . . vagueness challenge”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Bolger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GalanesSupreme Court of Vermont· 2015-06-12· cited 11×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2013-11-22· cited 9×
- State v. KorkowAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-12-13· cited 7×
- Tofelogo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2017-12-01· cited 4×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2018-12-14· cited 3×
- State v. TofelogoAlaska Supreme Court· 2019-06-28· cited 3×
- Adam Keith Kasgnoc Sr. v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2019-06-28
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.