· 1/29/2009
Bates v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
Citations
- 596 F. Supp. 2d 1054
- 46 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1050
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6321
- 2009 WL 281696
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the use of present tense was relevant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Avern Cohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.