Bates v. MTH Homes-Texas, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the language of the [arbitration] agreement must clearly indicate the intent to arbitrate”
• stating that “the language of the [arbitration] agreement must clearly indicate the intent to arbitrate”
• stating that reviewing courts may not read an agreement to arbitrate into a contract “when one otherwise does not exist” and that the contract must clearly indicate the intent to arbitrate
• stating that reviewing courts may not read an agreement to arbitrate into a contract “when one otherwise does not exist” and that the contract must clearly indicate the intent to arbitrate
• rejecting argument that, if parties had intended to allow litigation of disputes in court, “they would have used language such as ‘court of law’” in contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).