Skip to main content
· 4/6/1948

Bates v. McClees

Citations

  • 76 F. Supp. 939
  • 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Fourth Circuit “has consistently held that Virginia does recognize an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing in common law contracts”
  • noting that even if a party has an express contractual right, the party is “forbidden from acting dishonestly”
  • holding that contravening standard business practices is not dishonest
  • finding that plaintiff stated a plausible claim for breach of the implied covenant, because the contract gave defendant the right to terminate the agreement if it found that plaintiff made a misrepresentation
  • analogizing Virginia Vermiculite to find the covenant could be breached when a bank had discretion as to its contract performance but acted arbitrarily in exercising that discretion
  • when a defendant has an express right under the contract, that party is “forbidden from acting dishonestly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGranery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.