· 4/6/1948
Bates v. McClees
Citations
- 76 F. Supp. 939
- 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2931
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Fourth Circuit “has consistently held that Virginia does recognize an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing in common law contracts”
- noting that even if a party has an express contractual right, the party is “forbidden from acting dishonestly”
- holding that contravening standard business practices is not dishonest
- finding that plaintiff stated a plausible claim for breach of the implied covenant, because the contract gave defendant the right to terminate the agreement if it found that plaintiff made a misrepresentation
- analogizing Virginia Vermiculite to find the covenant could be breached when a bank had discretion as to its contract performance but acted arbitrarily in exercising that discretion
- when a defendant has an express right under the contract, that party is “forbidden from acting dishonestly”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGranery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.