Bates v. Maclaren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well‐established that on habeas review, a federal court cannot disagree with a state court’s resolution of an issue of state law.”
• a state appellate court cannot have unreasonably applied clearly-established federal law where the state appellate court’s decision was based on a resolution of state law
• “[A] claim that a state court misunderstood the substantive requirements of state law does not present a claim under § 2254.” (cleaned up
• “It is well‐established that on habeas review, a federal court cannot disagree with a state court’s resolution of an issue of state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).