Skip to main content
· 7/1/1850

Bates v. Churchill

Citations

  • 32 Me. 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim that accrued on August 13, 2007, and remained unresolved through June 26, 2008, was pending during the Schoemehl window and had to be 10 decided using that analysis
  • “statutory amendments reducing or eliminating penalties may be retrospectively applied”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tenney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.