Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 10/15/1867
Bates v. Bates
Citations
- 97 Mass. 392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- homestead cannot exist in an estate in which the owner has only an undivided interest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court· 1881-07-01· cited 32×
- Atlantic Savings Bank v. Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1980-02-27· cited 22×
- Varnes v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court· 1932-07-02· cited 16×
- Assistant Recorder of the North Registry District v. SpinelliMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1995-06-23· cited 13×
- In Re BrizidaD. Massachusetts· 2002-04-24· cited 9×
- Ladd v. SwansonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-08-28· cited 6×
- Howes v. BurtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1881-02-24· cited 6×
- Weller v. WellerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1881-10-22· cited 5×
- In Re GrayD. Massachusetts· 2007-12-07· cited 3×
- Holmes v. WinchesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1885-02-27· cited 2×
- Estate of GreenCalifornia Superior Court, San Francisco County· 1888-04-07
- In re CunninghamD. Massachusetts· 2002-04-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.