Skip to main content
· 12/16/1994

Bates Ex Rel. Murphy v. Shearson Lehman Bros.

Citations

  • 42 F.3d 79
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35419
  • 1994 WL 696235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • exclusion of testimony deemed harmless where testimony would not have established viable cause of action
  • asking whether the investment appeared regular on its face

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Campbell, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.