Skip to main content
· 3/29/2001

Baten v. Wehuda

Citations

  • 281 A.D.2d 366
  • 722 N.Y.S.2d 534
  • 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the defendant’s “participation [in a settlement agreement] constitutes sufficient purposeful activity to subject her to jurisdiction”
  • upholding jurisdiction where an action merely involved the “subject matteri’-interest in stock-of a New York settlement agreement and not enforcement of the settlement agreement itself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.