Basulto-Rodriguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in a boundary line dispute, where there is no transcript of the evidence, findings of fact must be accepted as true by the appellate court
• “[I]n the absence of a transcript of the evidence, it is well settled that the “findings of fact made by the trial court are supported by the evidence heard in that court and must be accepted as true by the appellate court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).