Bassey Udom v. Daniel Fonseca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Having held plaintiff’s claims barred by the statute of limitations, the district court properly granted him leave to amend in order to state any claims that were not time-barred.”
• affirming 25 dismissal, although reversing denial of leave to amend, where a “plaintiff [had] attempt[ed] to 26 expand the scope of his complaint by making allegations in a collateral document not subject to 27 counter by means of an answer or motion to dismiss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).