Bass v. McMahon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ properly rejected a treating source’s opinion that the claimant was disabled because such a determination was reserved to the Commissioner
• holding that the ALJ properly rejected a treating source’s opinion that the claimant was disabled because such a determination was reserved to the Commissioner
• holding that ALJ properly rejected treating source’s opinion where, among other things, “other evaluators found that plaintiff was not disabled, a finding the ALJ found to be better supported by objective medical evidence”
• stating that a treating physician’s report that merely repeats the claimant’s assertions is not objective medical evidence
• stating that the Court may not “try the case de novo, resolve conflicts in evidence, or decide questions of credibility”
• noting that courts should not retry the case, resolve conflicts of evidence, or make credibility determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).