Bass v. Harper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that deed would not result in an over-conveyance if it included language \limiting the grant to one-half of whatever interest [grantor] owned\
• holding grantee is charged with notice of reservations in chain of title
• “The instrument in question does not relate the outstanding mineral royalty interests to the warranty. It could have done so, but it is tied specifically to the grant.”
• “The instrument in question does not relate the outstanding mineral royalty interests to the warranty. It could have done so, but it is tied specifically to the grant.”
• “The instrument in question does not relate the outstanding 30 mineral royalty interests to the warranty. It could have done so, but it is tied specifically to the grant.”
• “The instrument in question does not relate the outstanding mineral royalty interests to the warranty. It could have done so, but it is tied specifically to the grant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).