Skip to main content
· 4/27/2007

Baska v. Scherzer

Citations

  • 156 P.3d 617
  • 283 Kan. 750
  • 2007 Kan. LEXIS 247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the doctrine of transferred intent applied and plaintiffs could not style their claim as negligence where defendant intended to punch a third party but instead punched plaintiff
  • recognizing that transferred intent applies to intentional torts of assault and battery
  • finding that a court is not bound by the characterization of the claims in a plaintiff's petition because substance prevails over form
  • describing negligence as an unintentional breach of a legal duty causing damage reasonably foreseeable without which breach the damage would not have occurred
  • applying transferred intent doctrine to assault and battery torts when plaintiff was injured when she stepped between two sparring defendants
  • civil assault entails threat of bodily harm coupled with apparent ability to carry out threat resulting in victim's immediate apprehension of harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Johnson, Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.