Basile v. Walt Disney Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that venue is not proper because “none of the events giving rise to” the plaintiff’s “claims occurred in New York.”
• denying habeas relief because the petitioner did not demonstrate that “the allegedly-erroneous state court evidentiary rulings violated an identifiable constitutional right.” (citing Rosario v. Kuhlman, 839 F.2d 918, 924 (2d Cir. 1988)
• “[I]t is hornbook law that venue and personal jurisdiction are threshold procedural issues to be decided before the substantive grounds in a motion to dismiss.”
• “in a case of multiple claims, proper venue must be established with respect to each cause of action asserted, . . . [a]nd where venue is challenged, it is plaintiff’s burden to show that it is proper in the forum district” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).