Skip to main content
· 7/1/1986

Basile v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc.

Citations

  • 640 F. Supp. 697
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the value of the benefit rendered is the first factor listed because it is the most important one
  • finding that the value of the benefit rendered is listed as the first factor because it is the most important one
  • allowing time spent on fee petitions in common fund cases because of the importance of the petitions in protecting the class
  • 25% awarded where case tenaciously litigated over four year period, tens of thousands of documents produced, many depositions taken
  • application of percentage of recovery method in common fund case such that value of common fund is first factor to consider
  • in Sixth Circuit, factors to be considered in determining reasonable percentage include the value of the services on a hourly basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spiegel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.