Skip to main content
· 6/6/2001

Basic Fun, Inc. v. X-CONCEPTS, LLC

Citations

  • 157 F. Supp. 2d 449
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11618
  • 2001 WL 893876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the Third Circuit does not recognize the ‘nominative’ fair use defense, which is utilized as a defense solely in the Ninth Circuit”
  • stating that “the Third Circuit does not recognize the ‘nominative’ fair use defense, which is utilized as a defense solely in the Ninth Circuit”
  • “If the infringers sincerely intended not to infringe, the injunction harms them little; if they do, it gives [the trademark owner] substantial protection of its trademark.”
  • “A movant has no burden to prove likely repetition of the infringement to obtain an injunction.”
  • “If the infringers sincerely intended not to infringe, the injunction harms them little; if they do, it gives [the trademark owner] substantial protection of its trademark.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.