Skip to main content
· 8/19/1997

Bashir v. Amtrak

Citations

  • 119 F.3d 929
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 21870
  • 1997 WL 433766

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that more than “mere negligence” in losing or destroying evidence is required to sustain an inference of consciousness of a weak case
  • explaining that “an adverse inference” is warranted when the “absence of . . . evidence is predicated on bad faith”
  • requiring a showing of bad faith for the imposition of an adverse inference
  • “in this circuit the negligent destruction of evidence is insufficient to support an adverse jury instruction”
  • an adverse inference is drawn when a party fails to preserve evidence and the party’s failure was predicated on bad faith
  • “an adverse inference is drawn from a party’s failure to preserve evidence only when the absence of that evidence is predicated on bad faith.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Birch, Per Curiam, Woods

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.