Skip to main content
· 9/15/1871

Bash v. Hill

Citations

  • 62 Ill. 216

Syllabus

<p>1. Contbact—services to effect sale. Where the plaintiffs are employed by defendants to assist in making a trade in real estate with a promise of a certain compensation in case the same is effected, and do assist in bringing about a trade, they will be entitled to recover the sum agreed to be paid, even though the defendants had changed their proposition, with a view to dispense with plaintiffs’ services, when the plaintiffs received no notice of such fact.</p> <p>2. When a party engages the services of another to assist him in making an exchange of property, if he desires to dispense with such services, he should give the other party notice. If he does not, and the service is rendered, he will be required to pay for the same.</p>

Judges: Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.