Basf Plant Science, Lp v. Commonwealth Scientific

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because actions relating to an internal business dispute were not intended to influence an external marketplace, the plaintiffs had failed to show the “trade or commerce” required to maintain a ch. 93A claim
• a violation of section 11 requires proof that the acts complained of were perpetrated in a business context
• attorney did not inject himself in a commercial transaction because his statements were not made to influence an external marketplace

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).