Skip to main content
· 12/18/2012

BASF Corp. v. Director of Revenue

Citations

  • 392 S.W.3d 438
  • 2012 WL 6680932
  • 2012 Mo. LEXIS 284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a combination principal-accomplice wanton murder instruction appropriate because the evidence supported both alternatives
  • reversing defendants’ convictions because the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to remove, for cause, two unqualified jurors, but holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting SBS/AHT expert testimony
  • child abuse pediatrician's expert testimony that victim died as a result of abusive head trauma was admissible under Daubert , and citing Narang I
  • child abuse pediatrician’s expert testimony that victim died as a result of abusive head trauma was admissible under Daubert, and citing Narang I
  • “Complicity is not a separate offense. It is rather an alternative theory of the charged offense.”
  • “Where the juror’s responses and the rest of the circumstances have created a genuine doubt as to the juror’s impartiality, further questioning meant to resolve the doubt by eliciting further information is certainly appropriate[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breckenridge, Draper, Fischer, Neill, Russell, Stith, Teitelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.