Baseball Quick, LLC v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that unsophisticated investor had not “discovered” a securities fraud, for purposes statute of limitations after sending defendants multiple requests for information. and investment liquidation and not receiving replies
• finding that plaintiffs’ claim that defendants “charge[d] ... excessive commissions and margin interest” was not “independent of the contract” and thus dismissing plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claim (internal quotation marks omitted)
• dismissing the IAA claim where defendant failed to establish an investment advisor contract, or relationship to confer the right of action
• dismissing breach of contract claim “because Plaintiffs fail to identify what specific provisions of the contract they claim Defendants breached”
• dismissing breach of contract claim “because [p]laintiffs fail to identify what specific provisions of the contract they claim [d]efendants breached”
• enforcing disclaimer that “‘[defendant] is not acting as fiduciary for’ [plaintiff]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).