Barwood, Inc.,appellees v. District of Columbia,appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the District of Columbia is not subject to diversity jurisdiction because it, “like a state, is not a citizen of a state (or of itself) for diversity purposes.”
• noting the District of Columbia “is not a citizen of a state (or of itself) for diversity purposes”
• “[M]ere incon sistency with state, or even federal, law will not suffice to create a Fourth Amendment cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).