· 1/15/1982
Bartz v. Wheat
Citations
- 285 S.E.2d 894
- 169 W. Va. 86
- 1982 W. Va. LEXIS 652
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating, while agency principles may be useful in some circumstances to understand the family purpose doctrine, we are not constrained by agency labels where the real purpose of the doctrine is to better a plaintiff’s chance of financial award
- while agency analogy might be helpful, rationale supporting family purpose doctrine is to enhance possibility of plaintiff’s financial recovery
- though family purpose doctrine is analogous to agency, it has a different rationale and so cannot be used as a defense technique to bar recovery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Neely
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.