Skip to main content
· 1/15/1982

Bartz v. Wheat

Citations

  • 285 S.E.2d 894
  • 169 W. Va. 86
  • 1982 W. Va. LEXIS 652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, while agency principles may be useful in some circumstances to understand the family purpose doctrine, we are not constrained by agency labels where the real purpose of the doctrine is to better a plaintiff’s chance of financial award
  • while agency analogy might be helpful, rationale supporting family purpose doctrine is to enhance possibility of plaintiff’s financial recovery
  • though family purpose doctrine is analogous to agency, it has a different rationale and so cannot be used as a defense technique to bar recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.