Bartz v. Board of Supervisors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cannot satisfy Rule 9(b) by alleging simply that the defendant made a contract to register shares and never performed any of them because “[a] contract may be breached for legitimate business reasons”
• “Rule 9(b) is not satisfied where the complaint vaguely attributes the alleged fraudulent statements to ‘defendants.’”
• \Employment contracts promising shares as compensation are generally considered securities transactions.\
• in a securities fraud case, noting that “Rule 9(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).