Bartsch v. Planning & Zoning Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring a buffer between one zone of a particular classification and another zone of a different classification in one instance but not in others violates the statutory uniformity requirement
• uniformity requirement prohibited commission from attaching condition to granting of zone change and special permit requiring fifty foot green belt buffer area
• perpetual restrictive covenant limiting the use of the property to a medical office building and a requirement of a green belt as a condition to a zone change
• facts nearly identical to those in Veseskis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kaufman v. Zoning Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-02-07· cited 163×
• State v. Summerville
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-01-05· cited 19×
• Pleasant Valley Neighborhood Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning Commission of South Windsor
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-07-05· cited 14×
• MacKenzie v. Planning & Zoning Commission
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-10-15· cited 8×
• Jachimek v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-11-07· cited 6×
• Dibble v. Ferguson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-06-28· cited 4×
• Hartshorne v. Whitefish
  Montana Supreme Court· 2021-05-11

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Veseskis v. Bristol Zoning Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-04-15· cited 22×
• Fullerton v. McGowan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1986-04-01· cited 12×