· 9/30/1957
Bartram v. Graham
Citations
- 157 F. Supp. 757
- 52 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1144
- 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2571
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[P]etitioner’s claim involving allegedly improper interpretation of the state’s sentencing guidelines is not a cognizable claim for federal habeas review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: J. Joseph Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.