Skip to main content
· 10/18/2011

Barton v. Zimmer, Inc.

Citations

  • 662 F.3d 448
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 20982
  • 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 929
  • 2011 WL 4921603

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that adverse employment actions generally fall into three categories: (1) termination; (2) transfers that reduce career prospects; and (3) unbearable changes in conditions
  • noting that “termination” constitutes an “[a]dverse employment action[] for purposes of the federal antidiscrimination statutes”
  • holding, in the context of an ADEA discrimination claim, that “[the Plaintiff] was not fired and his compensation was not reduced, so an award of back pay is unavailable”
  • holding, in the context of an ADEA discrimination claim, that “[the Plaintiff] was not fired and his compensation was not reduced, so an award of back pay is unavailable”
  • affirming summary judgment because no evidence existed to show that defendant’s action were taken “because Barton took medical leave”
  • “Receiving a challenging work assignment typically is not sufficiently adverse to amount to a retaliatory adverse employment action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sykes, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.